Illinois Tool Works management check

ITW · Industrials · Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components · CEO Christopher A. O’Herlihy

Filings as of

61
Management score, ranked 305th of 487Strongest: clean books. Weakest: owner returns. See the best and worst run in Industrials →

3 good · 2 to watch · 1 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Flag

    Have owners done well?

    Trailed its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $136, against $192 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Watch

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay only loosely tracked returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of -0.13 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • Good

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    0.5% of net income

    $15.2m of reported pay in fiscal 2025, against $3.1bn of net income.

  • n/a

    Do they own the stock?

    No recent CEO filing

    Both: 1 buyer ($200k) and 2 sellers ($12.0m) in six months.

  • Good

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count shrinking

    Diluted shares changed -1.9% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 0.4% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Watch

    Is leadership stable?

    2 CEOs in the pay table

    CEOs in the pay table: E. Scott Santi, Christopher A. O’Herlihy. 3 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Industrials.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns1326%55
Pay for performance439%86
CEO cost7577%48
Skin in the game——55
Dilution7365%62
Stable leadership6039%75
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components, by management score. Illinois Tool Works is 58th of 81 in its sector.

  1. 120HUBBHubbell Incorporated75
  2. 123GWWW. W. Grainger74
  3. 151PHParker Hannifin72
  4. 170OTISOtis Worldwide71
  5. 179SNASnap-on70
  6. 196DOVDover Corporation69
  7. 197IRIngersoll Rand69
  8. 213PNRPentair68
  9. 286XYLXylem Inc.62
  10. 293NDSNNordson Corporation62

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed March 27, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$20.9m$41.8m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$136
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025Christopher A. O’Herlihy$15.2m$14.9m$4.3m$136$192$3.1bn
2024Christopher A. O’Herlihy$10.9m$11.0m$3.8m$136$161$3.5bn
2023E. Scott Santi$22.5m$34.8m$4.8m$138$132$3.0bn
2022E. Scott Santi$22.2m$18.7m$4.3m$113$114$3.0bn
2021E. Scott Santi$20.8m$41.8m$5.0m$124$120$2.7bn

The board says pay is tied most to After-tax ROIC. Its other key measures: Operating Margin, EPS Growth, CBI Yield, Organic Revenue Growth, Operating Income Growth vs. Prior Year.

Insiders and the CEO's stake

Both: 1 buyer ($200k) and 2 sellers ($12.0m) in six months.

  • BoughtJennifer F. ScanlonDirector$200kJun 2, 2026
  • SoldErnest Scott SantiDirector$11.9mAug 19, 2026
  • SoldMatteo C. PigozzoVP & Chief Accounting Officer$80kAug 13, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: May 12, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $15.3bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, and $315.0m of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$14.5bn$15.9bn$16.1bn$15.9bn$16.0bn
Net income—————
Stock-based pay$53.0m$63.0m$69.0m$61.0m$69.0m
Buybacks$1.0bn$1.8bn$1.5bn$1.5bn$1.5bn
Dividends$1.5bn$1.5bn$1.6bn$1.7bn$1.8bn
Diluted shares316m311m304m298m292m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.