MGM Resorts management check

MGM · Consumer Discretionary · Casinos & Gaming · CEO William Hornbuckle

Filings as of

70
Management score, ranked 184th of 487Strongest: owner returns. Weakest: skin in the game. See the best and worst run in Consumer Discretionary →

5 good · 1 to watch · 1 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Good

    Have owners done well?

    Beat its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $116, against $82 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Good

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay rose and fell with returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of 0.86 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • Flag

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    4.9% of net income

    $25.3m of reported pay in fiscal 2025, against $520.9m of net income.

  • Watch

    Do they own the stock?

    CEO stake ≈ 0.2 years of pay

    The CEO holds 139,594 shares, directly or through trusts (unvested awards not counted): about 0.2 years of pay. Light activity: no buys, $257k sold in six months.

  • Good

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count shrinking

    Diluted shares changed -12.1% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 0.5% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Good

    Is leadership stable?

    6 leadership filings in 3 years

    CEO in the pay table: Mr. Hornbuckle. 6 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Consumer Discretionary.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns100100%70
Pay for performance9376%79
CEO cost016%44
Skin in the game06%36
Dilution100100%74
Stable leadership9575%80
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Casinos & Gaming, by management score. MGM Resorts is 25th of 47 in its sector.

  1. 160LVSLas Vegas Sands72
  2. 174FFord Motor Company71
  3. 176DHID. R. Horton71
  4. 184MGMMGM Resorts70
  5. 191ABNBAirbnb69
  6. 266WYNNWynn Resorts64

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed March 27, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$19.0m$38.0m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$116
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025Mr. Hornbuckle$25.3m$25.9m$6.7m$116$82$520.9m
2024Mr. Hornbuckle$15.8m$438k$5.9m$110$85$1.1bn
2023Mr. Hornbuckle$17.0m$38.0m$6.1m$142$85$1.3bn
2022Mr. Hornbuckle$16.2m$6.4m$5.5m$106$65$206.7m
2021Mr. Hornbuckle$13.3m$29.1m$5.7m$142$87$1.2bn

The board says pay is tied most to RELATIVE TSR. Its other key measures: Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”)., Relative TSR, measured with respect to the S&P 1500 Hotels, Restaurants and Leisure Index., Stock Price..

Insiders and the CEO's stake

William Hornbuckle (CEO AND PRESIDENT) held 139,594 shares directly after their latest Form 4 on Oct 7, 2026, roughly $4.2m at that filing's price.

Light activity: no buys, $257k sold in six months.

  • SoldDaniel J TaylorDirector$257kMay 22, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: May 8, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $9.4bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, 195% of net income, and $380.8m of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$9.7bn$13.1bn$16.2bn$17.2bn$17.5bn
Net income$1.3bn$1.5bn$1.1bn$746.6m$205.9m
Stock-based pay$65.2m$71.3m$73.6m$80.2m$90.5m
Buybacks$1.8bn$2.8bn$2.3bn$1.4bn$1.2bn
Dividends$4.8m$4.0m$0$0—
Diluted shares487m413m359m310m277m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.