Nasdaq, Inc. management check

NDAQ · Financials · Financial Exchanges & Data · CEO Adena T. Friedman

Filings as of

66
Management score, ranked 234th of 487Strongest: stable leadership. Weakest: dilution. See the best and worst run in Financials →

4 good · 2 to watch · 1 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Good

    Have owners done well?

    Beat its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $235, against $197 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Good

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay rose and fell with returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of 0.63 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • Watch

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    1.4% of net income

    $25.0m of reported pay in fiscal 2025, against $1.8bn of net income.

  • Watch

    Do they own the stock?

    Insiders are selling

    6 insiders sold $8.8m in the last six months and none bought. 8 of 19 sales ran on pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans.

  • Flag

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count growing

    Diluted shares changed +6.7% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 2.0% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Good

    Is leadership stable?

    3 leadership filings in 3 years

    CEO in the pay table: Adena T. Friedman. 3 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Financials.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns7469%49
Pay for performance8249%83
CEO cost3840%67
Skin in the game——51
Dilution07%69
Stable leadership100100%80
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Financial Exchanges & Data, by management score. Nasdaq, Inc. is 42nd of 72 in its sector.

  1. 84SPGIS&P Global78
  2. 201ICEIntercontinental Exchange68
  3. 221CMECME Group67
  4. 222CBOECboe Global Markets67
  5. 230MCOMoody's Corporation66
  6. 234NDAQNasdaq, Inc.66
  7. 241MSCIMSCI65
  8. 366COINCoinbase57
  9. 404FDSFactSet53

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed April 24, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$34.5m$69.0m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$235
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025Adena T. Friedman$25.0m$59.1m$10.4m$235$197$1.8bn
2024—$21.5m$51.1m$5.9m$185$179$1.1bn
2023—$18.5m$9.8m$6.5m$137$139$1.1bn
2022—$28.0m$25.9m$6.4m$142$121$1.1bn
2021—$20.0m$69.0m$3.4m$160$136$1.2bn

The board says pay is tied most to Non-GAAP Operating Income. Its other key measures: Net Revenue, ARR, Non-GAAP Diluted EPS.

Insiders and the CEO's stake

6 insiders sold $8.8m in the last six months and none bought. 8 of 19 sales ran on pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans.

  • SoldPc Nelson GriggsPres. Capital Access Platforms$3.5mAug 10, 2026
  • SoldBradley J PetersonEVP, CIO$2.5mAug 7, 2026
  • SoldCohen TalPres. Market Platforms$1.4mApr 27, 2026
  • SoldBryan Everard SmithEVP, CPO · 10b5-1 plan$649kAug 3, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: Jun 16, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $4.1bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, 66% of net income, and $624.0m of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$5.9bn$6.2bn$6.1bn$7.4bn$8.3bn
Net income$1.2bn$1.1bn$1.1bn$1.1bn$1.8bn
Stock-based pay$90.0m$106.0m$122.0m$141.0m$165.0m
Buybacks$468.0m$308.0m$269.0m$145.0m$616.0m
Dividends$350.0m$383.0m$441.0m$541.0m$601.0m
Diluted shares505m498m508m579m579m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.