Phillips 66 management check

PSX · Energy · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · CEO Mr. Lashier

Filings as of

56
Management score, ranked 375th of 487Strongest: dilution. Weakest: stable leadership. See the best and worst run in Energy →

2 good · 2 to watch · 2 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Flag

    Have owners done well?

    Trailed its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $225, against $343 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Watch

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay only loosely tracked returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of 0.46 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • n/a

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    Not enough data

    No pay or net income figure for the latest year.

  • Watch

    Do they own the stock?

    Insiders are selling

    6 insiders sold $7.5bn in the last six months, against $30k bought. 3 of 16 sales ran on pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans.

  • Good

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count shrinking

    Diluted shares changed -5.1% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 0.2% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Flag

    Is leadership stable?

    3 CEOs in the pay table

    CEOs in the pay table: Greg Garland, Mr. Lashie, Mr. Lashier. 9 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Energy.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns721%64
Pay for performance7334%65
CEO cost——66
Skin in the game——49
Dilution100100%58
Stable leadership05%73
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing, by management score. Phillips 66 is 17th of 20 in its sector.

  1. 131VLOValero Energy73
  2. 157MPCMarathon Petroleum72
  3. 375PSXPhillips 6656
  4. 388OXYOccidental Petroleum55
  5. 414OKEOneok51
  6. 426APAAPA Corporation50

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed April 2, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$18.2m$36.5m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$225
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025Mr. Lashier$23.1m$32.4m$7.4m$225$343—
2024Mr. Lashier$22.6m$20.0m$7.2m$191$283—
2023Mr. Lashier$19.4m$34.7m$8.8m$216$251—
2022Mr. Lashie, Greg Garland$18.2m$36.5m$7.6m$162$194—
2021Greg Garland$21.0m$21.5m$8.2m$109$133—

The board says pay is tied most to Adjusted PSP ROCE. Its other key measures: •Adjusted VCIP EBITDA, •Adjusted VCIP Controllable Costs, •Adjusted PSP ROCE, •3-Year Relative TSR.

Insiders and the CEO's stake

6 insiders sold $7.5bn in the last six months, against $30k bought. 3 of 16 sales ran on pre-arranged 10b5-1 plans.

  • BoughtKevin Omar MeyersDirector$30kMay 6, 2026
  • SoldVanessa Allen SutherlandEVP, GC and Secretary · 10b5-1 plan$7.4bnJul 21, 2026
  • SoldBrian MandellExecutive Vice President$13.4mSep 16, 2026
  • SoldRichard G HarbisonEVP, Refining$11.7mAug 12, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: May 14, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $19.2bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, 74% of net income, and $1.1bn of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$111.5bn$170.0bn$147.4bn$143.2bn$132.4bn
Net income$1.3bn$11.0bn$7.0bn$2.1bn$4.4bn
Stock-based pay$144.0m$210.0m$297.0m$210.0m$220.0m
Buybacks$0$1.5bn$4.0bn$3.5bn$1.2bn
Dividends$1.6bn$1.8bn$1.9bn$1.9bn$1.9bn
Diluted shares440m474m453m422m408m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.